FCEA Blog: Commentary: A response to Wil Burns: Common Misunderstandings About SRM Geoengineering
„We welcomed the response of Wil Burns to our recent article, “Five solar geoengineering tropes that have outstayed their welcome.” In our article, we cited five common but inaccurate claims about SRM. Burns responded to three of our rebuttals, concluding that our article “doesn’t wholly dispel many of the concerns outlined in the piece.” Ultimately, in his comments we have not found anything that refutes what we wrote. We remain convinced that the claims that we cited are unsupported by existing evidence, unlikely to occur, or greatly exaggerated.“