Monat: April 2021

Pasztor, Janos; Harrison, Nicholas (2021): Introduction to the Special Issue: ‘Governing Climate‐altering Approaches’

Pasztor, Janos; Harrison, Nicholas (2021): Introduction to the Special Issue: ‘Governing Climate‐altering Approaches’. In Glob Policy 12 (S1), pp. 5–7. DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.12943.

„This special issue presents new insights relating to the governance of climate‐altering approaches together with possible ways to address knowledge and governance gaps in future.“

LINK

Jinnah, Sikina; et al. (2021): Splitting Climate Engineering Governance: How Problem Structure Shapes Institutional Design

Jinnah, Sikina; Morrow, David; Nicholson, Simon (2021): Splitting Climate Engineering Governance: How Problem Structure Shapes Institutional Design. In Glob Policy 12 (S1), pp. 8–19. DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.12900.

„This article adds conceptual discipline to a well‐rehearsed but largely intuitive argument within the climate engineering community that carbon dioxide removal (CDR) and solar radiation management (SRM) should be treated separately – ‘split’ rather than ‘lumped’ – in policy discussions.“

LINK

Mace, M. J.; et al. (2021): Large‐Scale Carbon Dioxide Removal to Meet the 1.5°C Limit: Key Governance Gaps, Challenges and Priority Responses

Mace, M. J.; Fyson, Claire L.; Schaeffer, Michiel; Hare, William L. (2021): Large‐Scale Carbon Dioxide Removal to Meet the 1.5°C Limit: Key Governance Gaps, Challenges and Priority Responses. In Glob Policy 12 (S1), pp. 67–81. DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.12921.

„This paper considers governance challenges that arise from the need to rely on CDR to meet the Paris Agreement’s long‐term temperature goal.“

LINK

Galán-Martín, Ángel; et al. (2021): The consequences of inaction on carbon dioxide removal

Galán-Martín, Ángel; Vázquez, Daniel; Cobo, Selene; Dowell, Niall Mac; Caballero, José; Gosalbez, Gonzalo Guillen (2021): The consequences of inaction on carbon dioxide removal. Preprint. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-422173/v1.

„Here, we investigate the still poorly understood implications of delaying CDR actions, focusing on integrating direct air capture and bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (DACCS and BECCS) into the European Union power mix.“

LINK

Sovacool, Benjamin K. (2021): Reckless or righteous? Reviewing the sociotechnical benefits and risks of climate change geoengineering

Sovacool, Benjamin K. (2021): Reckless or righteous? Reviewing the sociotechnical benefits and risks of climate change geoengineering. In Energy Strategy Reviews 35, p. 100656. DOI: 10.1016/j.esr.2021.100656.

„[T]his study reviews and summarizes a large number of geoengineering assessments published over the past decade to document prospective benefits, but also reveal potential risks. It aims to provide a comprehensive evidence base on GGR and SRM technologies that is rigorous, timely, and interdisciplinary.“

LINK

Duan, Hongbo; et al. (2021): Assessing China’s efforts to pursue the 1.5°C warming limit

Duan, Hongbo; Zhou, Sheng; Jiang, Kejun; Bertram, Christoph; Harmsen, Mathijs; Kriegler, Elmar et al. (2021): Assessing China’s efforts to pursue the 1.5°C warming limit. In Science (New York, N.Y.) 372 (6540), pp. 378–385. DOI: 10.1126/science.aba8767.

„By conducting a multimodel study, we find that the 1.5°C-consistent goal would require China to reduce its carbon emissions and energy consumption by more than 90 and 39%, respectively, compared with the “no policy” case.“

LINK

Grassi, Giacomo; et al. (2021): Critical adjustment of land mitigation pathways for assessing countries’ climate progress

Grassi, Giacomo; Stehfest, Elke; Rogelj, Joeri; van Vuuren, Detlef; Cescatti, Alessandro; House, Jo et al. (2021): Critical adjustment of land mitigation pathways for assessing countries’ climate progress. In Nat. Clim. Chang. DOI: 10.1038/s41558-021-01033-6.

„Here we present a ‘Rosetta stone’ adjustment to translate IAMs’ land-use mitigation pathways to estimates more comparable with GHG inventories.“

LINK

Tech Crunch: As ExxonMobil asks for handouts, startups get to work on carbon capture and sequestration

„Earlier this week, ExxonMobil, a company among the largest producers of greenhouse gas emissions and a longtime leader in the corporate fight against climate change regulations, called for a massive $100 billion project (backed in part by the government) to sequester hundreds of millions of metric tons of carbon dioxide in geologic formations off the Gulf of Mexico.“

LINK