redding.com: Geoengineering coalition in our future?
Response to Ricke, Katharine L.; et al. (2013).
By Clive Hamilton. “Engineering the climate is appealing to a powerful strand of Western technological thinking that sees no ethical or other obstacle to total domination of nature. Promethean plans for mastery have always met resistance from those who mistrust human technological overreach.”
By Ken Caldeira. “Solar geoengineering offers the hope of partial symptomatic relief. Of course, it is better to address the root cause of the problem, but cancer patients are glad that there has been research into painkillers.”
“This event will provide your business/organisation with an overview of potential for NETs in the UK and will provide an opportunity to discuss the challenges and opportunities.”
Critical response to Ricke, Katharine L.; et al. (2013). “Social authoritarianism may be the way to go”
“NASA’s international experience will enable researchers to explore the options fully, and to develop the most effective technologies for reducing this ongoing experiment’s risks.”
Luokkanen, M.; Huttunen, S.; Hilden, M. (2013): Geoengineering, news media and metaphors: Framing the controversial. In: Public Understanding of Science. (in press)
“We show that metaphors strengthen a policy-related storyline, while metaphors are rarer in purely descriptive accounts.”
Media response to Ricke, Katharine L.; et al. (2013). “This type of proposed solution carries with it a number of uncertainties, however, including geopolitical questions about who would be in charge of the activity and its goals.”
“This article suggests that the current atmospheric CO2 level is already triggering amplifying feedbacks from the Earth system and therefore, in themselves, efforts at reduction in atmospheric CO2-emission are no longer sufficient to prevent further global warming”