Schlagwort: BECCS

Nature – Braun et al. (2025): Multiple planetary boundaries preclude biomass crops for carbon capture and storage outside of agricultural areas

Johanna Braun, Constanze Werner, Dieter Gerten, Fabian Stenzel, Sibyll Schaphoff, Wolfgang Lucht IN: Communications Earth & Environment, 6, https://doi.org/10.1038/s44221-024-00361-z

Six of nine planetary boundaries are currently transgressed, many related to human land use. Conversion of sizeable land areas to biomass plantations for Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS) – often assumed in climate mitigation scenarios to meet the Paris Agreement – may exert additional pressure on terrestrial planetary boundaries. Using spatially-explicit, process-based global biogeochemical modelling, the authors systematically compute feedstock production potentials for BECCS under individual and joint constraints of the planetary boundaries for nitrogen flows, freshwater change, land system change and biosphere integrity (including protection of remaining forests), while reserving current agricultural areas for meeting the growing global demand for food, fodder and fibre.

LINK

Sher et al. (2025): Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage technology to achieve net zero emissions–A review

Farooq Sher, Saman Hameed, Narcisa Smječanin Omerbegović, Bohong Wang, Irfan Ul Hai, Tazien Rashid, Yew Heng Teoh, Magdalena Joka Yildiz IN: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2024.115229

This novel comprehensive review thoroughly explores the contribution of biomass oxy-fuel technology in capturing CO2 and achieving net zero emissions. Furthermore, the review meticulously addresses pollution emissions and ash-related issues along with control strategies in the fluidized bed oxy-fuel configuration, providing in-depth insights into scale-up feasibility and techno-economic and environmental analysis. 

LINK

Nature – Braun et al. (2025): Multiple planetary boundaries preclude biomass crops for carbon capture and storage outside of agricultural areas

Johanna Braun, Constanze Werner, Dieter Gerten, Fabian Stenzel, Sibyll Schaphoff, Wolfgang Lucht IN: Communications Earth & Environment 6, 102, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-02033-6

Six of nine planetary boundaries are currently transgressed, many related to human land use. Conversion of sizeable land areas to biomass plantations for Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS) – often assumed in climate mitigation scenarios to meet the Paris Agreement – may exert additional pressure on terrestrial planetary boundaries. Using spatially-explicit, process-based global biogeochemical modelling, we systematically compute feedstock production potentials for BECCS under individual and joint constraints of the planetary boundaries for nitrogen flows, freshwater change, land system change and biosphere integrity (including protection of remaining forests), while reserving current agricultural areas for meeting the growing global demand for food, fodder and fibre. 

LINK

Heimannet al. (2025): Expert projections on the development and application of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage technologies

Tobias Heimann, Lara-Sophie Wähling, Tomke Honkomp, Ruth Delzeit, Alessandra Pirrone, Franziska Schier, Holger Weimar IN: Environmental Research Letters, 20, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ada16f

To assess the former pros and cons of Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) deployment, interdisciplinary model approaches require detailed estimates of technological information related to BECCS production technologies. Current estimates of the cost structure and capture potential of BECCS vary widely due to the absence of large-scale production. To obtain more precise estimates, a global online expert survey (N = 32) was conducted including questions on the regional development potential and biomass use of BECCS, as well as the future operating costs, capture potential, and scalability in different application sectors

LINK

Nature – Zhou et al., (2025): Contributions of countries without a carbon neutrality target to limit global warming

Jiaxin Zhou, Wei Li, Philippe Ciais, Thomas Gasser, Jingmeng Wang, Zhao Li, Lei Zhu, Mengjie Han, Jiaying He, Minxuan Sun, Li Liu, Xiaomeng Huang IN: Nature Communications, 16,  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-55720-x

Some countries have made no commitment to carbon neutrality but are viewed as potential Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) candidates (hereafter, non-CN countries). Here the authors analyze contributions of these countries to global climate mitigation with respect to BECCS using an Earth system model with explicit representations of bioenergy crops.

LINK

Nature – Zhou et al. (2025): Contributions of countries without a carbon neutrality target to limit global warming

Jiaxin Zhou, Wei Li, Philippe Ciais, Thomas Gasser, Jingmeng Wang, Zhao Li, Lei Zhu, Mengjie Han, Jiaying He, Minxuan Sun, Li Liu, Xiaomeng Huang IN: Nature Communications 16, 468, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-55720-x

Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) is a key negative emission technology for climate mitigation. Some countries have made no commitment to carbon neutrality but are viewed as potential BECCS candidates. Here the authors analyze contributions of these countries to global climate mitigation with respect to BECCS using an Earth system model with explicit representations of bioenergy crops.

LINK

Xing et al. (2024): A review of influencing factors for policy interventions in the deployment of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage

Xiaofan Xing, Yuankang Xiong, Rong Wang, Yuan Gao, Siqing Xu, Philippe Ciais, Thomas Gasser, Josep Penuelas, Jordi Sardans, Jianmin Chen, Tang Xu, Renhe Zhang IN: Next Sustainability, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nxsust.2024.100040

This paper reviews the latest understanding of BECCS. The key findings reveal the limitations of current models in projecting the capacity and costs of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS), mainly due to insufficient consideration of ecological consequences, including availabilities of biomass and difficulties in the transportation of biomass and CO2. To reduce uncertainties in the capacity and costs of BECCS, it is urgently needed to apply spatially explicit method for estimating the life-cycle emissions and the complete cost items when deploying BECCS, optimize the network of biomass acquisition, power plants retrofitting and transportation of biomass and CO2, and represent the changes in the availability of biomass (for different types of bioenergy plants) under the impacts of climate change.

LINK

Desport et al. (2025): Feasibility, conditions, and opportunities for achieving net-negative emissions in the global cement industry

Lucas Desport, Carlos Andrade, Damien Corral, Sandrine Selosse IN: International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 141, 104280, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2024.104280

The cement industry possesses multiple options to decarbonize its operations, including material efficiency, energy efficiency, clinker content reduction, hydrogen utilization, bioenergy, and carbon capture and storage (CCS). By integrating bioenergy and CCS (BECCS), the industry could produce net-negative cement, surpassing the 2050 carbon neutrality pledge of the Global Cement and Concrete Association. In TIAM-FR, a bottom-up optimization model of the global energy system, the authors developed an explicit model of the global cement industry to analyze the potential contribution of BECCS to producing cleaner cement. The authors investigated the technical and policy conditions favorable to BECCS deployment and sustainability, considering different future biomass potentials, yields, rotation periods, and management costs. 

LINK

Xie et al. (2024): Negative emissions technologies in energy system models and mitigation scenarios – a systematic review

Weipeng Xie, Vahid Aryanpur, Paul Deane, Hannah E. Daly IN: Applied Energy 380, 125064, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.125064

Modelled scenarios within Integrated Assessment Models and Energy Systems Models indicate that limiting global temperature rise to safe levels will require some dependence on negative emissions technologies. However, the representation of NETs varies significantly across models, leading to differences in their roles across mitigation scenarios. BECCS and DACCS are two possible solutions that are directly related to the energy system. Here, we perform a systematic review of the representation of BECCS and DACCS within ESMs and IAMs, exploring their roles in decarbonisation scenarios and identifying how NETs contribute to energy system transition pathways.

LINK

Ogle et al. (2024): Process safety in bioenergy with carbon capture and storage systems (BECCS)

Russell A. Ogle, Sean J. Dee, Isaac Mastalski IN: Process Safety Progress, https://doi.org/10.1002/prs.12657

There are numerous potential technologies and flowsheets for implementing BECCS, and the supply chains rely upon support from the agricultural, forestry, and solid waste industries. Inherent in BECCS systems are the hazards associated with combustible dusts, spontaneous ignition and smoldering of combustible solids, flammable liquids, flammable vapors and gases, toxic gases, and more. For BECCS to be deployed commercially across the United States, it is imperative that process safety risks are controlled. A risk-based process safety (RBPS) program can help manage the risks of a BECCS facility and minimize process safety incidents. In this paper, we present two representative bioenergy technologies as mini-case studies to illustrate the range of process hazards encountered. Process safety strategies required by regulation are briefly reviewed and potential gaps are identified.

LINK